Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 33% better in F1 22 than ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR - 254 vs 191 FPS
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 46% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $1899.0 vs $3499.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing F1 22 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $9.94 vs $13.78 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.78/FPS
72.13352685050798%
Price, $
$3499.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22633 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
191
75.19685039370079%
Value, $/FPS
$9.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22623 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
56.45046329294369%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
59.803020354563365%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-12900F
null-core
Single-Core
2539
85.37323470073974%
Multi-Core
13890
68.93984514592019%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 4 TB SSD |
