Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 230% better in Rust than MXZ - 231 vs 70 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 83% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $849.0 vs $5099.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Rust than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $12.13 vs $22.08 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$22.08/FPS
54%
Price, $
$5099.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15242 minutes ago
Buy for $849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
15%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5950X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
