Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper Dell XPS 8950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Control than Dell XPS 8950 - 205 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Control than Dell XPS 8950 - $24.88 vs $32.86 per FPS
Advantages of Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 8% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $4699.0 vs $5099.99
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$24.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$5099.99
92%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $5,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Buy for $4,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
43%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
100%
Multi-Core
15445
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC | vs | Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5950X | CPU | Core i9-12900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
