Key Differences
In short — Mavark 4K outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Up to 54% cheaper than Mavark 4K - $3499.99 vs $7599.00
- Up to 34% better value when playing Ready or Not than Mavark 4K - $16.67 vs $25.08 per FPS
Advantages of Mavark 4K Gaming PC
- Performs up to 44% better in Ready or Not than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 303 vs 210 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
210
69%
Value, $/FPS
$16.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$3499.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $3,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
Buy for $7,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 294 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
43%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Mavark 4K Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 8 TB SSD |
