Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper Panorama RTX 4060 TI on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Panorama RTX 4060 TI is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 48% better in F1 23 than Panorama RTX 4060 TI - 210 vs 142 FPS
Advantages of Panorama RTX 4060 TI Gaming PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $1399.99 vs $2799.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing F1 23 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $9.86 vs $13.33 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.33/FPS
73.96849212303074%
Price, $
$2799.99
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
FPS
142
67.61904761904762%
Value, $/FPS
$9.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97.04190632703367%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68.50348027842227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Panorama RTX 4060 TI Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 3 TB HDD |
