Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Centaurus Proton 2 outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Up to 40% cheaper than Centaurus Proton 2 - $2799.99 vs $4696.95
Advantages of Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 87% better in Ready or Not than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 306 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Ready or Not than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $15.35 vs $17.07 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
164
53.59477124183007%
Value, $/FPS
$17.07/FPS
89.92384299941418%
Price, $
$2799.99
100%
Buy for $2,799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2681 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
306
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4696.95
59%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $4,696.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2689 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27.44081172491545%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
26.72868217054264%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900K
null-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
