Key Differences
In short — ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation outperforms the cheaper CLX on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing CLX is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Starfield than CLX - 78 vs 77 FPS
Advantages of CLX Gaming PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation - $2849.99 vs $4999.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Starfield than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation - $37.01 vs $64.1 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
78
100%
Value, $/FPS
$64.1/FPS
57%
Price, $
$4999.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,999.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Buy for $2,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
63%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | CLX Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
4 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD | Storage | 4 TB HDD |