Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost 2.0 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Ghost 2.0 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 113% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than ViprTech Ghost 2.0 - 134 vs 63 FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC
- Up to 75% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation - $879.99 vs $3549.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation - $13.97 vs $26.49 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$26.49/FPS
52%
Price, $
$3549.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Buy for $879.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
186.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
532.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
4 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |