Key Differences
In short — ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 49% better in World of Warcraft than MXZ - 208 vs 140 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 75% cheaper than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation - $849.0 vs $3349.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing World of Warcraft than ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation - $6.06 vs $16.11 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.11/FPS
37%
Price, $
$3349.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for $849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
186.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
532.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
