Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper NSX GAMING on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing NSX GAMING is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 106% better in World of Tanks than NSX GAMING - 426 vs 207 FPS
Advantages of NSX GAMING PC
- Up to 64% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $1089.0 vs $3049.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing World of Tanks than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $5.26 vs $7.16 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
426
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.16/FPS
73%
Price, $
$3049.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Buy for $1,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
34%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | NSX GAMING PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |