Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MSI Codex R on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Codex R is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 79% better in Dead Space than MSI Codex R - 125 vs 70 FPS
Advantages of MSI Codex R Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 67% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $999.0 vs $3049.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dead Space than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $14.27 vs $24.4 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$24.4/FPS
58%
Price, $
$3049.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
70
56%
Value, $/FPS
$14.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
34%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i5-13400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2290
78%
Multi-Core
10745
54%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | MSI Codex R Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
