Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper STGAubron on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing STGAubron is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 106% better in F1 23 than STGAubron - 327 vs 159 FPS
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 79% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $1049.99 vs $5049.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing F1 23 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $6.6 vs $15.44 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
327
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.44/FPS
42%
Price, $
$5049.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
17th Variation
FPS
159
48%
Value, $/FPS
$6.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1049.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
17th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
17th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
24%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
17th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
74%
Multi-Core
9171
46%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-11900F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
