Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 75% better in Sea of Thieves than MXZ - 281 vs 161 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Desktop PC
- Up to 81% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $939.0 vs $4849.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $5.83 vs $17.26 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FPS
281
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.26/FPS
33.77752027809965%
Price, $
$4849.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76756 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
161
57.29537366548043%
Value, $/FPS
$5.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$939
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
93.72858122001371%
Multi-Core
12259
62.44078846839505%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | MXZ Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 7600 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
