Key Differences
In short — Panorama outperforms the cheaper acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than Panorama - $1059.0 vs $2249.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Panorama - $8.75 vs $10.27 per FPS
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Performs up to 81% better in World of Warcraft than acer Nitro 50 N50 - 219 vs 121 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
8th Variation
FPS
121
55.25114155251142%
Value, $/FPS
$8.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1059
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,059 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77583 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.27/FPS
85.19961051606622%
Price, $
$2249.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
8th Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
32.44823386114495%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
20.04730165555794%
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB GDDR6X | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
70.4954954954955%
Multi-Core
8910
42.34388366124893%
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Panorama Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3080 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD |
