Key Differences
In short — CLX Horus outperforms the cheaper acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 59% cheaper than CLX Horus - $1339.0 vs $3299.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing No Man's Sky than CLX Horus - $14.71 vs $15.35 per FPS
Advantages of CLX Horus Gaming PC
- Performs up to 136% better in No Man's Sky than acer Nitro 50 N50 - 215 vs 91 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
FPS
91
42%
Value, $/FPS
$14.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1339
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for $3,299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
18%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
73%
Multi-Core
10780
51%
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | CLX Horus Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 6 TB HDD |
