Key Differences
In short — Panorama outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 70% cheaper than Panorama - $929.0 vs $3099.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Panorama - $7.68 vs $12.92 per FPS
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Performs up to 98% better in World of Warcraft than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 240 vs 121 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
FPS
121
50.416666666666664%
Value, $/FPS
$7.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$929
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.92/FPS
59.44272445820433%
Price, $
$3099.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18.655462184873947%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
11.426470588235293%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
70.4954954954955%
Multi-Core
8910
42.34388366124893%
1st Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Panorama Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD |
