Key Differences
In short — Panorama outperforms the cheaper acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 66% cheaper than Panorama - $1689.0 vs $4999.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dead Space than Panorama - $21.65 vs $29.59 per FPS
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Performs up to 117% better in Dead Space than acer Nitro 50 N50 - 169 vs 78 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
20th Variation
FPS
78
46.15384615384615%
Value, $/FPS
$21.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1689
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76071 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$29.59/FPS
73.16661034133153%
Price, $
$4999.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,999.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
20th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
30.033821871476885%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
19.62015503875969%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
84.48887455659465%
Multi-Core
15445
73.54761904761905%
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Panorama Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 4 TB SSD + 12 TB HDD |
