Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — STGAubron outperforms the more expensive Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 77% better in Battlefield 1 than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 143 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $919.99 vs $929.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $6.43 vs $11.47 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
81
56.64335664335665%
Value, $/FPS
$11.47/FPS
56.05928509154315%
Price, $
$929
99%
Buy for $929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
20th Variation
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$919.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $919.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
20th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
32.15449607724804%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
28.135184067592036%
20th Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
94.5619335347432%
Multi-Core
8910
88%
20th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
