Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — IPASON outperforms the more expensive Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of IPASON Gaming PC
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 274 vs 238 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $759.99 vs $929.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - $2.77 vs $3.9 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
FPS
238
86.86131386861314%
Value, $/FPS
$3.9/FPS
71.02564102564102%
Price, $
$929
81%
Buy for $929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$759.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $759.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45.114309906858594%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39.475021168501264%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
92.60611592879964%
Multi-Core
8539
95.8361391694725%
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | IPASON Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |