Key Differences
In short — msi Aegis R2 outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than msi Aegis R2 - $1059.49 vs $2099.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than msi Aegis R2 - $2.78 vs $4.45 per FPS
Advantages of msi Aegis R2 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 24% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 - 472 vs 381 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Jun 15th, 2024
FPS
381
80.72033898305084%
Value, $/FPS
$2.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1059.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,059.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
472
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.45/FPS
62.47191011235954%
Price, $
$2099.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Jun 15th, 2024
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jun 15th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74.5580808080808%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51.86649099692578%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jun 15th, 2024
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
91.88741721854305%
Multi-Core
17332
94.86590038314176%
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900F
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3020
100%
Multi-Core
18270
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | msi Aegis R2 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 15th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700F | CPU | Core i9-14900F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
