Key Differences
In short — PowerSpec Micro Center G479 outperforms the cheaper ABS Cyclone Aqua on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ABS Cyclone Aqua is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC
- Up to 60% cheaper than PowerSpec Micro Center G479 - $1199.99 vs $2999.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing F1 22 than PowerSpec Micro Center G479 - $7.55 vs $11.76 per FPS
Advantages of PowerSpec Micro Center G479 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 60% better in F1 22 than ABS Cyclone Aqua - 255 vs 159 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
FPS
159
62%
Value, $/FPS
$7.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.76/FPS
64%
Price, $
$2999.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,999.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
42%
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
84%
Multi-Core
14759
70%
ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC | vs | PowerSpec Micro Center G479 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
