Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ABS Cyclone Aqua outperforms the cheaper AVGPC Blizzard on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC
- Performs up to 21% better in Valorant than AVGPC Blizzard - 790 vs 653 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Valorant than AVGPC Blizzard - $1.77 vs $1.91 per FPS
Advantages of AVGPC Blizzard Gaming Computer PC
- Up to 11% cheaper than ABS Cyclone Aqua - $1249.0 vs $1399.99
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
FPS
790
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399.99
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Buy for $1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
100%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
95%
Multi-Core
13694
88%
ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC | vs | AVGPC Blizzard Gaming Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700F | CPU | Core i7-12700K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
