![[2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B0D2DKJH5F.jpg)
Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR Liquid Cooling outperforms the cheaper [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 17% cheaper than ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR Liquid Cooling - $2749.0 vs $3299.99
- Up to 12% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR Liquid Cooling - $11.75 vs $13.31 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16CHR Liquid Cooling Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than [2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 2X 2TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) - 248 vs 234 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
234
94.35483870967742%
Value, $/FPS
$11.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20421 minutes ago
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.31/FPS
88.27948910593538%
Price, $
$3299.99
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
89.30862437633641%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
90.47931713722916%
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
