Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper TUF F17 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TUF F17 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TUF F17 Laptop
- Up to 26% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $1859.99 vs $2499.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $12.65 vs $15.15 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil Village than TUF F17 - 165 vs 147 FPS
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $1,859.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5268 minutes ago
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.15/FPS
83.4983498349835%
Price, $
$2499
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024 • 6th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
TUF F17 Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
