Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper SIXNEC Acer Nitro 5 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of SIXNEC Acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 42% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $899.0 vs $1549.0
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 134% better in Rocket League than SIXNEC Acer Nitro 5 - 332 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 26% better value when playing Rocket League than SIXNEC Acer Nitro 5 - $4.67 vs $6.33 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FPS
142
42.77108433734939%
Value, $/FPS
$6.33/FPS
73.77567140600317%
Price, $
$899
100%
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36811 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
332
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
58%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
SIXNEC Acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-7700T | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
