Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Razer Blade Pro 17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Razer Blade Pro 17 - 65 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Razer Blade Pro 17 - $839.00 vs $2662.90
- Up to 70% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Razer Blade Pro 17 - $12.91 vs $42.95 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Jan 26th, 2021 • 10th Variation
FPS
62
95%
Value, $/FPS
$42.95/FPS
30%
Price, $
$2662.9
31%
Buy for $2,662.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Jan 26th, 2021 • 10th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 26th, 2021 • 10th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
124.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
249.6 GTexel/s
100%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
73%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 26th, 2021 • 10th Variation
Core i7-10875H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1520
77%
Multi-Core
6574
71%
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade Pro 17 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10875H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
360 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
