Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 15 Base outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF F15 144Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 56% cheaper than Razer Blade 15 Base - $839.0 vs $1920.5
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Razer Blade 15 Base - $839.0 vs $1920.5 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Apr 2nd, 2020 • 3rd Variation
FPS
1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1920.5/FPS
43%
Price, $
$1920.5
43%
Buy for $1,920.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$839/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Apr 2nd, 2020 • 3rd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Apr 2nd, 2020 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
75.84 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
170.6 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
56%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 2nd, 2020 • 3rd Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
100%
Multi-Core
5396
100%
3rd Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
94%
Multi-Core
4008
74%
Razer Blade 15 Base Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i5-10300H |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
