Key Differences
In short — MSI Katana A15 outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Asus TUF A16 - 98 vs 87 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 35% cheaper than MSI Katana A15 - $839.00 vs $1299.00
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Katana A15 - $9.64 vs $13.26 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
8th Variation
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.26/FPS
73%
Price, $
$1299
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1244 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
87
89%
Value, $/FPS
$9.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1252 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
8th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
79%
Multi-Core
9281
71%
MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
