Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI Katana A15 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - 97 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - $1259.0 vs $1398.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Deathloop than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - $12.98 vs $14.87 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1259
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,259 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
10th Variation
FPS
94
96.90721649484536%
Value, $/FPS
$14.87/FPS
87.28984532616006%
Price, $
$1398
90%
Buy for $1,398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
88.2583868665239%
Multi-Core
13044
78.97796076531847%
10th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
MSI Katana A15 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
