Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR Gaming Laptop
- Up to 38% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $869.0 vs $1399.0
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 79% better in War Thunder than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - 211 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing War Thunder than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - $6.63 vs $7.36 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
1st Variation
FPS
118
55.92417061611374%
Value, $/FPS
$7.36/FPS
90.08152173913044%
Price, $
$869
100%
Buy for $869 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261983 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
62%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
1st Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-10500
null-core
Single-Core
1519
61.497975708502025%
Multi-Core
5470
47.04971615344917%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10500 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 24 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
