Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 85% better in Counter-Strike 2 than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - 264 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - $809.0 vs $929.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR - $3.06 vs $6.5 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
5th Variation
FPS
143
54.166666666666664%
Value, $/FPS
$6.5/FPS
47.07692307692308%
Price, $
$929
87%
Buy for $929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13819 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
264
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
5th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i5-10500
null-core
Single-Core
1519
77.34215885947047%
Multi-Core
5470
58.93761448119814%
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF63 Thin 10SCXR Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
