Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 50% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $769.0 vs $1549.0
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 181% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than MSI GF63 - 135 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 28% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than MSI GF63 - $11.47 vs $16.02 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
48
35.55555555555556%
Value, $/FPS
$16.02/FPS
71.5980024968789%
Price, $
$769
100%
Buy for $769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
49%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-10500
3.1 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1519
61.497975708502025%
Multi-Core
5470
47.04971615344917%
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10500 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
