Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI GF63 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 37% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $979.0 vs $1549.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Valorant than ASUS TUF A16 - $2.23 vs $2.42 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 46% better in Valorant than MSI GF63 - 641 vs 440 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
FPS
440
68.64274570982839%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$979
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
641
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
92.14876033057851%
Price, $
$1549
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-11400H
2.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1818
73.60323886639677%
Multi-Core
6333
54.47273352829865%
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF63 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-11400H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
