Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Victus 16" on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 44 days newer than HP Victus 16".
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 467% better in Forza Horizon 5 than HP Victus 16" - 68 vs 12 FPS
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
May 1st, 2024
FPS
68
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mar 18th, 2024 • 6th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 18th, 2024 • 6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 18th, 2024 • 6th Variation
Ryzen 5 7640HS
4.3 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2295
100%
Multi-Core
9177
76%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2251
98%
Multi-Core
12037
100%
HP Victus 16" Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 18th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 5 7640HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
