Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper HP Victus 16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing HP Victus 16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Victus 16 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 11% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $1249.0 vs $1399.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ASUS TUF A16 - $16.88 vs $18.65 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HP Victus 16 - 75 vs 74 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
FPS
74
98.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$16.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3666 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$18.65/FPS
90.50938337801608%
Price, $
$1399
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
null-core
Single-Core
2388
96.68016194331985%
Multi-Core
11190
96.24978496473422%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
HP Victus 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
