Key Differences
In short — HP Omen outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Omen Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 34% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Asus TUF A16 - 90 vs 67 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 69% cheaper than HP Omen - $882.0 vs $2859.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HP Omen - $13.16 vs $31.77 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
17th Variation
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$31.77/FPS
41.4227258419893%
Price, $
$2859
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76143 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
67
74.44444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$13.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$882
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $882 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
17th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
17th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
17th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
74.62006079027356%
Multi-Core
9281
62.88366420489193%
HP Omen Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
