Key Differences
In short — HP Omen 17.3" 165Hz WQHD (2560x1440) IPS outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 144Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF F15 144Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Omen 17.3" 165Hz WQHD (2560x1440) IPS Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 218% better in Ready or Not than ASUS TUF F15 144Hz - 210 vs 66 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 81% cheaper than HP Omen 17.3" 165Hz WQHD (2560x1440) IPS - $839.0 vs $4339.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Ready or Not than HP Omen 17.3" 165Hz WQHD (2560x1440) IPS - $12.71 vs $20.66 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.66/FPS
61%
Price, $
$4339
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11155 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
66
31%
Value, $/FPS
$12.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
25%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
18%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
50%
Multi-Core
4008
24%
HP Omen 17.3" 165Hz WQHD (2560x1440) IPS Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 144Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i5-10300H |
| GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 8 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
