Key Differences
In short — HP Omen-17-CM2005CL outperforms the cheaper ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Omen-17-CM2005CL Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED - 80 vs 74 FPS
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop
- Up to 25% cheaper than HP Omen-17-CM2005CL - $1809.27 vs $2399.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dead Space than HP Omen-17-CM2005CL - $24.45 vs $29.99 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$29.99/FPS
81%
Price, $
$2399
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
May 3rd, 2023
FPS
74
92%
Value, $/FPS
$24.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1809.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,809.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
May 3rd, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
96%
Multi-Core
14759
89%
May 3rd, 2023
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
HP Omen-17-CM2005CL Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 3rd, 2023 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
