Key Differences
In short — HP Omen 17-CK200 outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF F15 15.6" 144Hz FHD on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF F15 15.6" 144Hz FHD is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Omen 17-CK200 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 136% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Asus TUF F15 15.6" 144Hz FHD - 99 vs 42 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF F15 15.6" 144Hz FHD Gaming Laptop
- Up to 68% cheaper than HP Omen 17-CK200 - $1039.99 vs $3209.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than HP Omen 17-CK200 - $24.76 vs $32.41 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$32.41/FPS
76.3961740203641%
Price, $
$3209
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,209 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3408 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
42
42.42424242424242%
Value, $/FPS
$24.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1039.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,039.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
57.2972972972973%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
39.502976960911205%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-10870H
null-core
Single-Core
1433
52.800294767870305%
Multi-Core
6094
37.09971995616706%
HP Omen 17-CK200 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF F15 15.6" 144Hz FHD Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-10870H |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 3 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
