Key Differences
In short — HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 7% better in Minecraft than ASUS TUF A16 - 674 vs 630 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 59% cheaper than HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display - $1119.00 vs $2719.00
- Up to 56% better value when playing Minecraft than HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display - $1.78 vs $4.03 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
2nd Variation
FPS
674
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.03/FPS
44%
Price, $
$2719
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,719 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
630
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
2nd Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
94%
Multi-Core
11626
79%
HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |