Key Differences
In short — HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 21% better in Dead Space than Asus TUF A16 - 80 vs 66 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 69% cheaper than HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display - $839.00 vs $2719.00
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dead Space than HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display - $12.71 vs $33.99 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$33.99/FPS
37%
Price, $
$2719
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,719 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
66
82%
Value, $/FPS
$12.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
75%
Multi-Core
9281
63%
HP OMEN 17 17.3" QHD 165Hz Display Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
