Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF F15 outperforms the more expensive HP OMEN-16T-WF000 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than HP OMEN-16T-WF000 - 56 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than HP OMEN-16T-WF000 - $1299.0 vs $2429.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than HP OMEN-16T-WF000 - $23.2 vs $44.98 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $2,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$23.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
87%
Multi-Core
10780
73%
HP OMEN-16T-WF000 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
