Key Differences
In short — HP OMEN-16T-WF000 outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Q540VJ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP OMEN-16T-WF000 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 56% better in The Last of Us Part I than ASUS Q540VJ - 53 vs 34 FPS
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 55% cheaper than HP OMEN-16T-WF000 - $1097.99 vs $2429.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than HP OMEN-16T-WF000 - $32.29 vs $45.83 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$45.83/FPS
70%
Price, $
$2429
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for $1,097.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
96%
Multi-Core
14759
89%
HP OMEN-16T-WF000 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
4 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
16.1" | Screen Size | 15.6" |