Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive HP Omen 16T-N000 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 20% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than HP Omen 16T-N000 - 125 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than HP Omen 16T-N000 - $949.0 vs $1309.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than HP Omen 16T-N000 - $7.59 vs $12.59 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
104
83.2%
Value, $/FPS
$12.59/FPS
60.28594122319301%
Price, $
$1309
72%
Buy for $1,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30155 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 6800H
null-core
Single-Core
1876
95.5193482688391%
Multi-Core
9010
97.0800560284452%
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
HP Omen 16T-N000 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 6800H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
