Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF F15 outperforms the more expensive HP OMEN 16T-K000 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF F15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 162% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HP OMEN 16T-K000 - 84 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than HP OMEN 16T-K000 - $1469.0 vs $1979.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HP OMEN 16T-K000 - $17.49 vs $61.84 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $1,979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1469
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
11th Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
HP OMEN 16T-K000 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF F15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
