Key Differences
In short — HP Omen 16T-K000 outperforms the cheaper Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Asus TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Omen 16T-K000 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 12% better in New World than Asus TUF A16 - 76 vs 68 FPS
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 37% cheaper than HP Omen 16T-K000 - $881.02 vs $1399.00
- Up to 30% better value when playing New World than HP Omen 16T-K000 - $12.96 vs $18.41 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
4th Variation
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$18.41/FPS
70%
Price, $
$1399
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5072 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
68
89%
Value, $/FPS
$12.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$881.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $881.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5067 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
4th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
79%
Multi-Core
9281
71%
HP Omen 16T-K000 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |