Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive HP OMEN 16 & Entertainment on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 26% better in World of Warcraft than HP OMEN 16 & Entertainment - 145 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than HP OMEN 16 & Entertainment - $1140.99 vs $2599.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing World of Warcraft than HP OMEN 16 & Entertainment - $7.87 vs $22.6 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
115
79.3103448275862%
Value, $/FPS
$22.6/FPS
34.82300884955752%
Price, $
$2599
43%
Buy for $2,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 605043 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1140.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
30.028409090909093%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27.455357142857146%
9th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
HP OMEN 16 Gaming & Entertainment Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | Radeon RX 7600S |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
