Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive HP Omen 16 2023 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HP Omen 16 2023 - 67 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than HP Omen 16 2023 - $949.0 vs $1449.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than HP Omen 16 2023 - $14.16 vs $24.15 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
7th Variation
FPS
60
89.55223880597015%
Value, $/FPS
$24.15/FPS
58.63354037267081%
Price, $
$1449
65%
Buy for $1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1977 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
7th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900
null-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
79.41771128184392%
Multi-Core
9281
71.15148727384238%
HP Omen 16 2023 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
