Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 outperforms the more expensive ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 60% better in No Man's Sky than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim - 107 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim - $899.0 vs $1015.72
- Up to 51% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim - $8.4 vs $17.31 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
FPS
67
63%
Value, $/FPS
$17.31/FPS
49%
Price, $
$1015.72
88%
Buy for $1,015.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
62%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
40%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Dec 13th, 2021 • 2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5800H
null-core
Single-Core
1749
76%
Multi-Core
7120
66%
1st Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS VivoBook Pro 16X OLED Slim Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Dec 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5800H | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 14" |