Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF F17 outperforms the cheaper ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop
- Up to 24% cheaper than ASUS TUF F17 - $959.99 vs $1269.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Battlefield IV than ASUS TUF F17 - $8.5 vs $10.67 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF F17 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim - 119 vs 113 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 1st, 2021
FPS
113
94%
Value, $/FPS
$8.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$959.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $959.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.67/FPS
79%
Price, $
$1269.99
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 1st, 2021
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 1st, 2021
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
85%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
93%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 1st, 2021
Core i5-11300H
3.1 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1689
100%
Multi-Core
4940
81%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Core i7-10870H
2.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1433
84%
Multi-Core
6094
100%
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F17 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-11300H | CPU | Core i7-10870H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
